User talk:109.63.227.255

June 2019
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 05:08, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.


 * Nuvola apps important.svg Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Melissa Ede, you may be blocked from editing. GiantSnowman 07:49, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

I have done nothing whatsoever disruptive, and I object to my edits being derided as 'vandalism'. I have edited the Melissa Ede page for factual accuracy. There is nothing in Wikipedia's policy on disruptive editing which applies to anything I've done. Enforcing incorrect or misleading pronouns here is shoehorning a political bias into the article, and political bias has no place at Wikipedia. To conform to a neutral point of view, basic factual accuracy should be maintained: Melissa Ede was a man. He self-identified as a woman, but was a man nonetheless.


 * Stop hand nuvola.svg You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Melissa Ede.  GiantSnowman 10:05, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. GiantSnowman 10:08, 14 June 2019 (UTC)


 * Except of course your editing was disruptive and Wikipedia does have policy on pronouns, see MOS:IDENTITY. GiantSnowman 10:18, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

To the next reviewing admin, note that I have extended the block to one week. This user clearly doesn't get it, and I'm deeply concerned they will continue their disruptive and WP:POINTy edits once the block expires. --Yamla (talk) 11:24, 14 June 2019 (UTC)


 * I don't know how more clearly I can say "I am perfectly willing to comply with Wikipedia's policies". Once again, I request this block be lifted. 109.63.227.255 (talk) 11:39, 14 June 2019 (UTC)


 * "One can't possibly deny that addressing a man by male pronouns is grammatically correct" I strongly suggest extending the block further and locking down talk page access at this time. This user is either outright trolling, using Wikipedia as a WP:BATTLEGROUND, or WP:CIR applies. No good will come out of allowing this user to continue editing, given their behaviour here. --Yamla (talk) 11:33, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
 * I endorse Yamla's suggestion. If this user doesn't believe they were disruptive and considers policies about disruptive editing to be irrelevant to this situation, I don't see cause to unblock them.  331dot (talk) 11:38, 15 June 2019 (UTC)