User talk:109.79.187.214

Ok. Thanks for the info. I will make sure to keep that in mind the next time I edit other pages. I'm sorry for causing trouble -- [ unsigned comment by User:ThunderPheonix2021 ]

Please see article talk page if you haven't already. Nothing personal, disagreements happen. I think we are all trying to improve the article in our own ways. I may have overreacted slightly to your first edit because a lot of people are now deliberately posting misleading edit summaries on purpose, but your subsequent edits was clearly in good faith but I still believe discussing to get an agreed wording is necessary, to establish some level of local consensus and avoid needless changing back and forth. Some editors think wordings like "mixed-to-negative" or "mixed-to-positive" are adequate but I think this kind of equivocating is not good and it is best to say reviews are either negative, mixed (most are), or positive, or take another approach entirely. Happy editing. -- 109.79.187.214 (talk) 15:48, 10 September 2019 (UTC)