User talk:109.86.177.144

== October 2022 = Hello, I'm Mako001. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to Raiffeisen Bank (Ukraine) because they seemed inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. Mako001 (C) (T)  🇺🇦 08:08, 18 October 2022 (UTC)

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for adding spam links. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia and potentially penalized by search engines. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. HJ Mitchell &#124; Penny for your thoughts? 16:54, 30 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Hello! Please explain why my links were considered spam?
 * I want to abide by the wikipedia rules. There was no malicious intent. I'm not going to spam.
 * Inserted information related to the companies on which I edited the pages.
 * I look at wikipedia and pasted links like other information sites. But for some reason, I got blocked and deleted, and their links continue to be on the pages. And many more unformed ones, such as anchorless links. But mine was considered spam, and they continue to be on the pages. For example, on the page of Ukrtelecom.
 * If I inserted links in the wrong place, then I apologize and explain what and where is not correct.
 * A few questions for you:
 * 1) Why are my links spam?
 * 2) There are no commerce and information sites in the links, why is this spam?
 * 3) Why then do other such links to informational sites remain, but mine was blocked? For example https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ukrtelecom https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Instituto_Polit %C3%A9cnico_de_Kiev_%C3%8Dgor_Sikorski#Historia
 * On the pages of my site to which I put links, information refers to companies. And I also found pages on Wikipedia pages where links to similar databases like mine are on the pages, but for some reason mine is deleted.
 * I certainly don't agree with the block and the spamming confession.
 * I would understand if I put links to commerce or to left articles and pages. But that's not the case. I repeat on the pages that I put links they corresponded to the pages on Wikipedia and there is information about the owners, court decisions, capital, information from the tax office and documents related to the company.
 * Help me to understand. 109.86.177.144 (talk) 11:55, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
 * WP:COI, WP:SPAM, WP:EL. See also WP:OTHERSTUFF. In general, adding a link to the same site across many articles, as you did, is inappropriate. You are welcome to readd your links once (1) you have declared your conflict of interest, and (2) you have obtained community consensus to do so. Not until then. --Yamla (talk) 12:00, 6 November 2022 (UTC)


 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

You forgot to show where you disclosed your conflict of interest and where you obtained consensus to add these links. --Yamla (talk) 13:15, 1 November 2022 (UTC)

In the request for unlocking, I indicated a link to the page on which I saw the blocking and on which I put the link. Here it is Ukrtelecom https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ukrtelecom&oldid=1119082917

You don't seem to understand what we are asking. Please link to the community discussion where you established a consensus agreement to add the link. You aren't doing this. 331dot (talk) 09:07, 3 November 2022 (UTC)


 * Please tell me how to do it? Where are these discussions? I can't edit anything anywhere. And it is nowhere to write except on this page. And that's why I'm writing here. Everywhere where I tried to write about this problem, I got an error that I had a block for supposedly spam. I don't spam though. Put links to your site with information. I wrote about this above. Help to understand please. So that I can do everything right. 109.86.177.144 (talk) 10:17, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
 * You aren't blocked for "supposedly spam", you are blocked for actually spamming. We add sources to articles after the sentence (or part of a sentence) they confirm. The example you give at Ukrtelecom (diff), where you add the link after the title of the article, is a textbook case of REFSPAM. You've done this from August to October until the block prevented you from spamming more. ~Styyx Talk ? 11:18, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry I didn't insert the notes correctly. I understood from your message where you can not insert. Tell me how can I be unlocked? And can I return at least some of the links that were posted without violating the rules?
 * If possible, tell me where you can read the rules on how to insert notes and I will take this into account in further editing. Where I inserted right after the name there and henceforth I will not do so.
 * I realized the mistake and understood why I got the blocking. But the intent was not to breed spam. Thanks for the clarification and clear answer. 109.86.177.144 (talk) 13:01, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Ответите мне?
 * Я хочу понять и разобраться. Помогите. Я прошу помощи и разобраться в ситуации, пишу что не понимаю и без ответа. Что я должен предоставить и какие дискусии? Дайте пожалуйста обратную связь. В прошлом сообщении я писал вопросы. 109.86.177.144 (talk) 16:20, 5 November 2022 (UTC)


 * This is English Wikipedia. Please communicate in English if you expect others to respond. OhNo itsJamie Talk 22:36, 5 November 2022 (UTC)


 * So can you help me sort out the situation? They tell me they blocked me for spam. They gave me a ban for a week, then another admin writes to me that the ban will not be removed. Writes that if I put links to this site in the future, I will be blacklisted. Can you find out the reasons? And then it all looks one-sided only. It’s just that I see that it’s possible to put one link, not even an anchor one, and to just news sites, but it’s impossible for others. Some double standards.
 * When I ask for help from you, I just get the feeling that they are ignoring and unsubscribing with standard phrases. I want to help wikipedia and want to edit. But I see that it is impossible to get help from the administration, but only threats are received on the block to me and the site without explanation. I repeat once again I put the link like everyone else, but I see that for some projects that put links on Wikipedia, they can be put, but mine was deleted and they gave me a block for spam. Although some information resources have much more links than I have set and everything is fine with them, how is it? I don't understand this. Why can they do it and others can't? They also told me that I put notes in the wrong place, well here I understood the mistake. Then the last comment from some admin and he tells me that if after unblocking you put the link again, then we will blacklist you and the site and all accounts from which the link to this site will be put. And here the question is again for you, why can one put links to information resources and, in particular, the same databases as mine, while others cannot? In particular, he gave an example with Ukrtelecom above and there, simply in the Note, the anchorless links are inserted on the news site and it turns out that they can, but the profile site that collects information about the company, beneficiaries, capital, court decisions is impossible.
 * They also write to me that I should throw a link or something else to the discussion on solving the problem. I write that I don’t understand what it is and where it should be and decide, they answer me again that I don’t understand anything and write again about it too. I do not understand you that it is difficult to help a person understand? I'm trying to figure it out and understand everything. But they just throw me somewhere without explanation. 109.86.177.144 (talk) 08:22, 6 November 2022 (UTC)