User talk:109.93.240.87

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either: This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
 * 1) Add four tildes  ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment, or
 * 2) With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button OOUI_JS_signature_icon_LTR.svg located above the edit window.

Thank you.

Please do not remove citations and text as you did on Environmental impact of war
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Environmental impact of war, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Netherzone (talk) 16:34, 28 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Checked sources and checked wiki policy about due and undue weight and what wikipedia is not /soapbox,advocacy/ etc, and my edit was with one summary edit explanation concerned main topic of this article. Also checked history of page and user added all that content without any edit summary or anything. I indeed added things about that law section, from the main article about law so I just expanded it with some easy to check content and what is connected with the main topic.

Please do not remove sourced content from Environmental impact of war - second warning
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Environmental impact of war. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges on that page. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. Please stop changing content that you do not agree with and removing sourced, referenced text and associated citations just because you disagree with it without first gaining consensus. You have removed three sections (headings and sourced content) three times now. Please stop the disruptive editing. And please sign your talk page contributions using four tilde's (this symbol ~) and indent them using a colon to keep the entries distinct from one another. I have added a colon to your comment above; please sign your comments. Thank you. Netherzone (talk) 16:17, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

November 2020
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Environmental impact of war, you may be blocked from editing. ''Your repeated removal of cited content is not acceptable. Please discuss concerns on the talk page and don't repeat the blanking of reasonable sections of cited text. I would agree that one source has been cited too often within one paragraph, but that's not a casue fo deleting the entire section.'' Nick Moyes (talk) 19:49, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Copying licensed material requires attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Environmental Modification Convention into Environmental impact of war. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 16:34, 29 November 2020 (UTC)