User talk:10a-182g-129d-28f

March 2017
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Tower of Babel, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. JudeccaXIII (talk) 03:40, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Tower of Babel shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Doug Weller talk 12:26, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Noah's Ark. Favonian (talk) 12:38, 11 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Creationist sources and a National Geographic article that says that a local flood is the cause of many flood myths aren't scientific evidence for a global flood. Doug Weller  talk 13:50, 11 March 2017 (UTC)