User talk:10qwerty

 ''Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting  --~  at the end. Start a new talk topic.''

Alicia Rickter
Hi 10qwerty!

Welcome and thanks for your edits on the Alicia Rickter page. Hope you stick around! :-) Jester2001 22:15, 10 May 2005 (UTC)

Playmates
I like the succession boxes. That your idea? I'm curious though. Will this mean that you're going to create a page for every Playmate so that there won't be all those red links? Dismas 07:36, 11 May 2005 (UTC)


 * Yeah, nice work with the succession boxes! Now we can easily figure out which playmates still need articles. Jester2001 19:59, 11 May 2005 (UTC)

Link Fixing
Thank you, I appreciate the help. --Silversmith 17:05, 11 May 2005 (UTC)

Philip Dawid
Thanks. RachelBrown 22:07, 11 May 2005 (UTC)

Playmate Info Box

 * I like the infobox you created. However, I might later tinker with the colours a little bit. 10qwerty 21:35, 12 May 2005 (UTC)


 * Please do, I've never had good colour coordination. So that's why chose gray to be safe. Jester2001 21:46, 12 May 2005 (UTC)


 * Nice work with the templates! Jester2001 18:50, 13 May 2005 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks a lot for help and advice.

Regards, Leonid
 * Comment made by IHUB.org Founder

Roger that
Thanks for the heads up. I'll take care of it. K1Bond007 19:35, May 15, 2005 (UTC)

James Bonham
btw, James Bonham appeared unimportant because the writer failed to mention the one interesting fact about him. Googling allowed me to make this clearer. Algebraist 23:19, 15 May 2005 (UTC)

No problem. It's still a (bad) stub, it just has some relevance now. Algebraist 23:25, 15 May 2005 (UTC)

Hello, Dolly!
I certainly do intend to create an article, Hello, Dolly! (song) and a disambiguation page. However, I'm running out of time, so it will be later that I do that. -- BRG 15:03, May 16, 2005 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion
Hello qwerty,

I'm sorry, I don't know the actual policies about the deletion of images which have been uploaded into the Commons, i know just the procedure in german Wikipedia, where those images are candidates for speedy deletion. I did it here just the same way in the hope it would be ok... --rdb 18:28, 16 May 2005 (UTC)

Your userpage does not exist, so...
Hi 10qwerty, I've noticed that you currently don't have a userpage. This makes your name appear as a redlink when signing talk pages, or when seen in Special:Recentchanges or the edit history of a page. One simple solution, if you don't want to create a userpage, is to edit your userpage and insert the following:

&#35;REDIRECT &#91;&#91;User talk:10qwerty&#93;&#93;

This will make your userpage a redirect to your talk page. If you ever want to create a user page, follow this link:

http://en.wikipedia.org

Alternatively, you could change your preferences to include a link to your talk page in your signature. For example, if you type

&#123;&#123;subst:User|10qwerty&#125;&#125;

on a page, save it, and copy the wikitext it produces into your signature, your signature will include:

User:10qwerty (talk • contribs)

Thanks, &rarr;I&ntilde;g&#333;lemo&larr;   talk 23:40, 2005 May 16 (UTC)


 * Actually, as of now, I currently prefer to not have a user page because I agree with some of the same reasons Uncle G does not have a user page (See User:Uncle G/On having a user page if you are unfamiliar with it). And if you notice on my current signature (10qwerty ), it actually links directly to my talk page now instead of my user page. Thanks anyway. 10qwerty 00:58, 17 May 2005 (UTC)

Image:Jicama.jpg
http://www.londonfruit.com/jicama.html i found the image here the owner doesn't say anything about the images though
 * Msg made by CRAZY SCIENTIST

no problem


 * ok --CRAZY SCIENTIST 01:40, 17 May 2005 (UTC)

Hello, about your VFD page change
I'm all for being bold and I reworded the statement to this:


 * According to past consensus, you are urged to include "subst:" and not just {&#123;vfd}}; this is easier on the servers. However, there are some disadvantages to this technique, and this practice has recently been disputed. Use {&#123;vfd}} if you like, or learn more about the issue.

But I have not committed my change because the link you provided does not link to a discussion about subst: in templates. I, actually, have reverted your edit (because it doesn't really make grammatical sense). Feel free to re-include it as soon as you provide a specific link to the relevant page (or even use my rewrite ;) ). Thanks. Ambush Commander 19:47, May 17, 2005 (UTC)
 * I'm only guessing but I think Ambush Commander might be mixing up your edit with the one made immediately after by Jesse's Girl. Rossami (talk)


 * Urp. That's right. Sorry. Should have done my research. I saw be bold and I saw an amendment to the policy and I was like "Huh, that's interesting," and I saw Rossami revert Jesse's edit and.. whoops. Sorry!!! Ambush Commander 00:59, May 18, 2005 (UTC)

Infobox call2
Hi, I've tried to modify the Template:Infobox UNSecGen to do something like Template:Infobox Playboy Playmate and display death dates and places if the person has died, and display nothing if they are alive. But it doesn't want to display right (see:Dag Hammarskjöld}. Can you take a look, as it seems you're a lot better at this than me.Trevor macinnis 18:26, 25 July 2005 (UTC) Nevermind ,figured it out:}Trevor macinnis 19:34, 25 July 2005 (UTC)

Barbara Moore (Playboy laymate)
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Barbara Moore (Playboy laymate), by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Barbara Moore (Playboy laymate) fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason: old duplicate of Barbara Moore (Playboy Playmate) To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Barbara Moore (Playboy laymate), please affix the template  to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 16:21, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

Playmate Stats (Info Box) On Wikipedia
Someone keeps vandalizing/removing the playmate stats in the article on Playboy playmate Stephanie Adams. According to the history of playmates being recorded on Wikipedia, all playmate stats were added as far back as 2005, (by you I think?) and removal of one is not consistent with all of the playmate articles. Your assistance is greatly appreciated. 208.120.11.116 (talk) 13:57, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

Nomination of Donna Smith (model) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Donna Smith (model) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Donna Smith (model) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Damiens .rf 01:15, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

An RfC that you may be interested in...
As one of the previous contributors to Infobox film or as one of the commenters on it's talk page, I would like to inform you that there has been a RfC started on the talk page as to implementation of previously deprecated parameters. Your comments and thoughts on the matter would be welcomed. Happy editing!
 * This message was sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of &#123;&#123;U&#124;Technical 13&#125;&#125; (t • e • c) 18:26, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Brittney Skye for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Brittney Skye is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Brittney Skye & until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Раціональне анархіст (talk) 04:35, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:00, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Brittney Skye for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Brittney Skye is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Brittney Skye& until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:57, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Nfltoday1980s.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Nfltoday1980s.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:28, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:National Football League 1970.svg
Thank you for uploading File:National Football League 1970.svg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION : This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:04, 22 July 2018 (UTC)