User talk:110.174.18.75

May 2024
Hello, I'm Paper9oll. I noticed that you recently removed content from Cha Eun-woo without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  — Paper9oll  (🔔 • 📝)  15:28, 29 May 2024 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Cha Eun-woo, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you.  — Paper9oll  (🔔 • 📝)  10:56, 30 May 2024 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Cha Eun-woo, you may be blocked from editing.  — Paper9oll  (🔔 • 📝)  03:27, 31 May 2024 (UTC)

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as done at Cha Eun-woo. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:44, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.