User talk:110.44.18.224

Introduction to contentious topics
Funcrunch (talk) 20:58, 27 March 2024 (UTC)


 * abuse of process to silence dissenters. classic. 110.44.18.224 (talk) 20:33, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

March 2024
Please stop. If you continue to use talk pages for inappropriate discussion, as you did at Talk:Transphobia, you may be blocked from editing. Funcrunch (talk) 20:58, 27 March 2024 (UTC)

silenced because i don't believe what you believe. classic.110.44.18.224 (talk) 20:34, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Amortias (T)(C) 20:40, 29 March 2024 (UTC)


 * i got blocked because you're bigots who will silence any dissent.110.44.18.224 (talk) 20:41, 29 March 2024 (UTC)


 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.


 * Responding to a block about your civility by being more uncivil is generally the opposite tack to take to assuage the reviewing admin of continued disruptive behavior. Q  T C 20:49, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

im not being uncivil, i have been accused of enaging in badfaith, lacking civility and trolling. all because i know that men cannot become women, and women cannot become men. i am not transphobic. i beleive transfolk should be treated with the same dignity and respect as the rest of us. but because i don't embrace the beliefs of other people, and am not afraid to say so, i am now fair game.110.44.18.224 (talk) 03:04, 30 March 2024 (UTC)

Transphobia
The fact that the article in question makes absolutely no reference to the ideological discourse between: people who hold views critical of gender and trans rights activists, and wikipedia bans talking about it, such as what is happening to me right now, highlights the ideological capture of editors of wikipedia.

i can know that men are incapable of becoming women, and that women are incapable of becoming men, without having a negative opinion of those who falsely believe that they can change their sex. where does the article account for people like me?

i love you all, but you hate me unless i convert or stay silent. where is your movement of love and peace now? what is inclusion and diversity worth if only an echo chamber is permitted? 110.44.18.224 (talk) 20:50, 29 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Given the unrepentant trolling, I think there is a good case to extend this block (maybe for a few weeks?) and also to revoke Talk page access as the unblock template, and this User Talk page more generally, is only being abused for further trolling. --DanielRigal (talk) 01:26, 30 March 2024 (UTC)

i'm not trolling, so consider for a moment that my genuinely held beliefs according to your religion can only be viewed as trolling. consider how inclusive and diverse your echo chamber really is.110.44.18.224 (talk) 02:58, 30 March 2024 (UTC)

 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ creation log] • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]) )

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.