User talk:111.68.99.100

September 2014
Hello, I'm Gilliam. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Sino-Russian relations since 1991 because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Gilliam (talk) 18:23, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2015
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Marco Verratti has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:25, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Marco Verratti was changed by 111.68.99.100 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.9054 on 2015-05-09T18:25:48+00:00.

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Marco Verratti with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. ... disco spinster   talk  18:31, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nelson's Cell (November 17)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nelson's Cell and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Nelson%27s_Cell Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:SwisterTwister&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Nelson%27s_Cell reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister  talk  05:59, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

Recent edits to Khaur
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Khaur, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 09:43, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

April 2016
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Lund University, you may be blocked from editing. Warning for these edits on Lund University. Thomas.W talk 15:37, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Nelson's Cell concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Nelson's Cell, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 22:31, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Nelson's Cell


Hello, 111.68.99.100. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Nelson's Cell".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the  or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 19:59, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

August 2016
Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Plasma (physics)— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Serols (talk) 16:13, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

August 2017
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Bentham Science Publishers has been reverted. Your edit here to Bentham Science Publishers was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links in references which are discouraged per our reliable sources guideline. The reference(s) you added or changed (https://benthamopen.com/indexing-agencies.php) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 04:29, 18 August 2017 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Hello, I'm Nihlus Kryik. An edit you recently made to Frontier Force Regiment seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — nihlus kryik   ( talk ) 15:54, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

February 2018
Hello, I'm CASSIOPEIA. I noticed that in this edit to Sahiwal Division, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 11:10, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

April 2019
Hello, I'm Mrwoogi010. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Johnny Orlando have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. Mrwoogi010 &#9993;  15:24, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2021
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum.   — Saadrafiq4 (talk) 08:53, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

May 2023
Hello, I'm Catalyzzt. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to List of serving generals of the Pakistan Army have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Catalyzzt (talk) 17:28, 18 May 2023 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of serving generals of the Pakistan Army. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Sahas P. (talk) 17:39, 18 May 2023 (UTC)