User talk:111AFK

Talkback
Bped1985 (talk) 19:33, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

July 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to John Mortimer Warfield, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: John Mortimer Warfield was changed by 111AFK (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.919866 on 2011-07-05T08:11:23+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:11, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Simon Lacey. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you! -- Arthena(talk) 08:23, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Blake Prize for Religious Art, you will be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Blake Prize for Religious Art was changed by 111AFK (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.85524 on 2011-07-05T09:24:40+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:24, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

This account was supposedly created by whose account was compromised. It appears as if this account has been compromised too, or .. Materialscientist (talk) 09:52, 5 July 2011 (UTC)