User talk:113.210.104.214

February 2019
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Mediacorp. Nutnut39 (talk) 13:09, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Mediacorp shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Nutnut39 (talk) 13:44, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

IpV6 Vandalizing Pages
Yes Nutnut39, I revert their edits because that stupid IpV6 trying to vandalize the page. And you should look at your talk page also, that IpV6 writing nonsense on your talk page, must be the same person who edit Mediacorp is doing it. 113.210.70.99 (talk) 14:24, 27 February 2019 (UTC)