User talk:114.125.132.198

December 2023
Hi 114.125.132.198! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Josh Cahill several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree&#32;at, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Chaotıċ Enby  (t · c) 10:49, 23 December 2023 (UTC)

Casting aspersions
Hi 114.125.132.198,

you seem to have been casting aspersions against other editors while editing and discussing the article about Josh Cahill. Please do not accuse others of misconduct without evidence, as doing so is a personal attack. While discussing and editing articles, please focus on the content instead of editors.

If you continue editing disruptively, such as by edit warring or keeping up the uncivil, unnecessarily personalized discussion style towards others, you may be banned from editing and discussing articles about living people, or blocked from editing, possibly without further warning – especially if this just continues after 's full page protection.

If something is unclear about this, please ask. You're now considered to be aware of these requirements.

Best regards, ~ ToBeFree (talk) 14:14, 23 December 2023 (UTC)