User talk:115.134.33.154

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. Robynthehode (talk) 07:11, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

Following Wikipedia 'Rules'
I have tried to help you regarding your edits at WP:PNB 118 and related pages. Your edits were reverted because you are not supplying a reliable source for your change. See WP:RS. As you are the editor making the change it is your responsibility to supply the source not mine. I have reluctantly now reported you for edit warring - WP:WAR because, despite helpful edit summaries from me and a request to take the dispute to the talk page you have ignored this accepted procedure. Although you are allowed to remove any comments on your talk page (here) all edits are recorded in the history and your removal of the previous edit warring notices is more evidence that you don't want to engage in the accepted process of Wikipedia. Maybe you should read WP:BRD, WP:V, WP:CIV, and WP:TRUTH. I have not reverted your edits at the affected articles for now but this does not mean they will not be changed in the future to reflect accepted Wikipedia processes. Again I ask you to take this dispute to the talk page and discuss why you think the height should be changed to the figure you have stated and you will need to provide reliable sources. Robynthehode (talk) 07:28, 28 October 2019 (UTC)


 * Problem is Is there any choice to put soruces since it will clear mess son. please don't misunderstand. sometimes Sources kinda outdated and can't be sure which is true or not. the PNB 118 Height is not my idea but since someone put on source about increase into 666mm so it should be updated and TRX Signature tower should be also on 492mm. Please don't try to cut it out. usually i don't like talk with any of this cause it might get trouble soon. CTBUH Can't be trusted too not because of sources but it should be updated soon enough but it didn't happen. i suggest you should find it thanks.115.134.33.154 (talk) 08:03, 28 October 2019 (UTC)


 * Done revent back. Please just find other than CBTUH So people can understand new updates.115.134.33.154 (talk) 08:04, 28 October 2019 (UTC)


 * Thanks for your revert. As I said above it is not my responsibility to find a source for YOUR change. It is up to YOU to supply those reliable sources. CTBUH is acknowledged as a reliable source. It may be outdated in certain respects but you cannot merely assert this you have to provide a more reliable source to counter what it says and even then you need to go to the talk page to justify your change with reasons why this new source is more reliable than CTBUH. The accepted process of disputed changes in articles is to take the issue to the talk page. If you are unwilling to do this then maybe Wikipedia is not for you. Please read the advice articles I linked and follow the recommended processes. Doing so will help make the encyclopaedia even better which I presume you want. Thanks. Robynthehode (talk) 08:29, 28 October 2019 (UTC)


 * One problem, putting the sources will not get easy anyway on the wikipedia.60.50.23.96 (talk) 04:01, 29 October 2019 (UTC)


 * A user's talk page is not the place to discuss sources or difficulties in getting the sources. If you want to improve the article the above relates to please go to the talk page to discuss Robynthehode (talk) 07:42, 29 October 2019 (UTC)