User talk:115.186.189.44

August 2021
Hello, I'm Aeschylus. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Carl Sagan—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. aeschylus (talk) 12:33, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

February 2023
Hello, I'm Ppt91. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Shahbaz Gill—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Ppt91 (talk) 02:07, 12 February 2023 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Faiz Hameed. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:44, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Faiz Hameed was changed by 115.186.189.44 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.870387 on 2023-02-12T02:44:01+00:00

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Hamid Gul, you may be blocked from editing. Firefly115 (talk) 16:46, 13 February 2023 (UTC)

August 2023
Hello, I'm Bruce1ee. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Recruitment have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. —Bruce1eetalk 09:38, 24 August 2023 (UTC)

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Recruitment. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. —Bruce1eetalk 09:42, 24 August 2023 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did at Recruitment, you may be blocked from editing. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. —Bruce1eetalk 08:02, 26 August 2023 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link, as you did at Recruitment. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. —Bruce1eetalk 08:08, 26 August 2023 (UTC)