User talk:115.96.103.214

April 2020
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Battle of Lalsot—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 07:34, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

No, all of the Edits were fully supported by a neutral source (Jadunath Sarkar, whose works are the standard authority) and much of the matter has been elaborated by me as well as full explanation has been given which is missing the earlier shallow edits.

This particular edit:- this edit is mainly including the inferior source that supports the Rajput claim to the victory, which is explained in Jadunath Sarkar's work as not exactly true. Do look into the source providef, I have added link as well. 115.96.103.214 (talk) 18:29, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Mahadaji Shinde shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.  Woerich   (talk)   18:36, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

There is no exact edit warring going on, the page is being spammed by with false Caste-based claiming of the personality with a source that nowhere supports any of this. I request protection of that page asap. Thank you.115.96.103.214 (talk) 18:42, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Battle of Lalsot. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 10:12, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

Please first look into the source itself. The Source has declared the matter as a Stalemate, it is not a personal synthesis. The whole context is laid out in the pages cited in the source. Without referring to the source kindly do not accuse me of providing my own analysis. The source declares there was neither Maratha or Rajput victory and also explains why sources that support Rajput victory are mistaken.

I also have a source that claims Maratha victory by "broke the back of the Rajput resistance." in "Anglo-Maratha Relations, 1785-96" by the scholar-professor Sailendra Nath Sen, page 133,. However the matured and renowned source of Jadunath Sarkar's Fall of the Mughal Empire dictactes that the battle was a stalemate and all the sources cover the higher casualties on the Rajput side and the Maratha retreat was owing to their own discretion. 115.96.103.214 (talk) 13:51, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

Battle of Assaye
I apologise if my edits to Battle of Assaye upset you but please remember to assume good faith and refrain making personal attacks and threats such as those contained in your edit summaries here.

Regarding infobox casualties I would prefer more precise figures for the Maratha losses but they are obviously not available. I thought the 6,000 estimate given by more recent studies was more suitable than the 1,200 dead and many more wounded that was provided by the British in the immediate aftermath of the battle. It has nothing to do with wanting to "beef up" the numbers. Regards. Barret (talk) 18:18, 9 May 2020 (UTC)

Your addition to the lead ("fiercest battle") is in my opinion superfluous. Wellington's opinion of the battle is covered in more detail later in the article where it mentions the significance of his high regard for this battle even after his subsequent notable successes. I don't see why this boast he made in a letter a few days after the battle is particularly noteworthy. Barret (talk) 18:46, 9 May 2020 (UTC)

New message from Anarchyte
 Anarchyte  ( talk &#8226;  work ) 14:35, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Replied.  Anarchyte  ( talk &#8226;  work ) 14:48, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

May 2020
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Suvarnadurg, you may be blocked from editing. BSMIsEditing (talk) 17:37, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.