User talk:115zak56

February 2015
Hello, I'm Donner60. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Jones— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 03:46, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jones with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 03:55, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Jones with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Donner60 (talk) 04:08, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

This is your last warning. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Luke Jones (footballer), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Luke Jones (footballer) was changed by 115zak56 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.931972 on 2015-02-04T05:23:42+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 05:23, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Materialscientist (talk) 23:10, 5 February 2015 (UTC) Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Luke Thomas Jones a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Cut-and-paste-move repair holding pen. Thank you. EoRdE6(Come Talk to Me!) 19:55, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Luke Thomas Jones


The article Luke Thomas Jones has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * probable hoax, no such player listed for Glenavon at http://www.glenavonfc.com/?page_id=15227, even if not, fails WP:NFOOTY as he has not played in a fully professional league

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Valenciano (talk) 23:20, 20 February 2016 (UTC)