User talk:11614soup/Archive 1

Use the Wikipedia department directory Sandbox

Footnotes and direct external links
Hi 11614soup. It is good to see all the effort you put into Kierkegaard-related articles. I am no Kierkegaard-expert myself, so I can't be of help regarding the factuals, but I do have a suggestion concerning the technical side of your edits. Instead of adding external links directly into the article text, like you did here, could you please instead add them as references instead, by using the -tags? It makes it much easier to read the article when external links are placed in the references, direct linking in the article should be mainly done as wikilinks. The guide to referencing may be of help to you. Thank you. --Saddhiyama (talk) 15:00, 19 August 2010 (UTC) Thanks Saddhiyama, I just started doing this and guess I'm interested in what I'm doing. want to follow all your rules so if you have any other suggestions I'll take them. I'll take a look at that page. Do you thiink I'm using too many quotes from Kierkegaard's works? --User:11614soup 9:45, 21 August 2010 (CST)

Answer from another person (--82.125.61.78 (talk) 19:34, 30 August 2010 (UTC) Mio Nielsen) : Yes, I do. Your quotes are good and relevant, but I am afraid the article is becoming too long and heavy. I would also ask you to concentrate your contributions and hence use fewer lines in the history. But I agree completely with your line of thought. I have myself been writing details about the attack on the church in both the danish, the french and the english article. and as you, I want to get away from the existentialist Kierkegaard and look at the man as he himself said he was: a christian writer, a great lover of the written language and a passionate enemy of any national-, or statechurch.--82.125.61.78 (talk) 19:34, 30 August 2010 (UTC) Thanks Mio, it just seems like I could go on forever and I don't know what to do with the shell that was there in Either or or on the front page. I'll try to concentrate my writing a little more but the quotes are very necessary because Kierkegaard says it better than any interpretor can. --User:11614soup 8:22, 30 August 2010 (CST) Well, my dear friend, we are up to a difficult task. I have one problem more: I do not write a correct english! You - and everyone - are hereby encouraged to correct my mistakes in the article. I agree that the journals of K. are very important. The original danish version is entirely on line. Is that the case with the translation too? M.N. --82.125.186.154 (talk) 07:56, 31 August 2010 (UTC) The Journals are online in English too http://www.naturalthinker.net/trl/texts/Kierkegaard,Soren/JournPapers/index.html --User:11614soup 5:19, 31 August 2010 (CST)

Adoption request
Hello there, ! I'm Netalarm and I have been around for quite some time now. I'm messaging you because I've noticed that you've indicated that you want to be adopted on your user page. I'd be more than happy to help you find a match for an adopter. All you have to do is fill out the survey located here so I can have the necessary information to match you up. Of course, you may also choose your own adopter - the instructions to do so are also on that page. If you have any questions, feel free to message me on my talk page.


 * Click here to go to the survey

Once again, welcome to Wikipedia! Netalarm talk 04:53, 9 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Hello there 11614soup I noticed you're interested in getting adopted, I will be more than happy to adopt you, for your information you may look at the lessons I offer here, if you already know most of what is outlined I will be willing to alter the program to suit your needs. Regards, —  Ғяіᴆaз'§Đøøм •  Champagne?  • 4:35pm • 05:35, 11 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Hey there. I thought I'd drop by and let you know I'd be happy to adopt you. With me, you can expect a lot of direct help, not just redirection an appropriate Manual of Style. Feel free to be impatient... so am I. But I know when to calm it down and get back to productivity, and can definitely help you with that aspect of Wiki. I also think that though our interests may not be on the same path, I'm open-minded enough to be fascinated by absolutely anything. With kids it's called curiosity, with me it's called ogling. Hit me back! bigforrap (talk) 21:21, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

"Talk:==Speedy deletion nomination of Thomas Henry Croxall==",

Hello
Interesting answers. The answer to what could be considered vandalism aren't necessarily wrong but they're not the best. Adding defamatory material on an article would be vandalism, so anything that constitutes a personal attack is vandalism. Removing content from articles for no apparent reason is vandalism. Repeatedly adding content that is not from a neutral point of view is vandalism, the last one is not a really good example but I think you get my drift. Choose your next lesson and tell me on my talk page. Regards, —  Ғяіᴆaз'§Đøøм •  Champagne?  • 9:19am • 22:19, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
 * I've moved your answers to your adoption subpage located here. Regards, —  Ғяіᴆaз'§Đøøм •  Champagne?  • 10:10am • 23:10, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

Cleanup
See WP:CLEANUP for the basic pointers, clean up involves improve the layout of an article and making paragraphs more concise instead them trailing on, removing anything trivial from an article. If you need anymore help ask me. Regards, —  Ғяіᴆaз'§Đøøм •  Champagne?  • 12:59pm • 01:59, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
 * If anything that isn't particularly important and you think it should be removed (use your best judgment) then remove it. Trivial information that is otherwise unhelpful is not needed. The lead of Two Upbuilding Discourses, 1843 is somewhat unclear as to whether it was about Europe or the book or Kierkegaard. The lead should generally be a summary of the key points of the article not the introductory paragraph. See WP:LEAD for how to develop a lead. I hope this helps. Regards, —  Ғяіᴆaз'§Đøøм •  Champagne?  • 3:12pm • 04:12, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
 * You're doing fine, what work have you done on the article itself in terms of cleanup? Remember when cleaning up articles make sure it fits with WP:CLEANUP and WP:MOS. Regards, —  Ғяіᴆaз'§Đøøм •  Champagne?  • 7:43pm • 08:43, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

Progress
How's it going with the cleanup? If I wasn't of much help please do let me know, I'll try my best to make sure I give you as much help as possible. Each time you complete an assignment I'll look over it and move it to your adoption subpage. You've done really well so far and I like what I'm seeing :) Keep up the good work. Regards, —  Ғяіᴆaз'§Đøøм •  Champagne?  • 4:02pm • 05:02, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Also don't forget to use edit summaries, there should be a prompt that you can enable in your Special:Preferences page under the Gadgets tab this prompt will remind you to enter an edit summary or heading in case you forget. Edit summaries are important because they allow others to get a basic understanding of what might have been in your edit. It is vital when making large changes to a page, because if you add large slabs of text and provide no edit summary other users may become suspicious of the edit, contrarily, if you remove a large slab of text which violates policy or is unsourced it is also very important to use edit summaries. Regards, —  Ғяіᴆaз'§Đøøм •  Champagne?  • 4:06pm • 05:06, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
Your article submission has been declined, and Wikipedia& was not created. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer, and please feel free to resubmit once the issues have been addressed. (You can do this by adding the text to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Jarkeld (talk) 15:58, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

Help
I want to like Category:Books by Søren Kierkegaard under Category:Modern philosophical literature like Kant and Hegel are

How do I do that?
 * Done. You simply have to add Category:Modern philosophical literature on the Category:Books by Søren Kierkegaard page.-- Obsidi ♠ n Soul  19:14, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Already done. DS (talk) 19:13, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Two Upbuilding Discourses, 1844


A tag has been placed on Two Upbuilding Discourses, 1844 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Sushiflinger (Goldblattster) (talk!) 04:12, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference
Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to  in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being minor in the usual way.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. With the script in place, you can continue with this functionality indefinitely (its use is governed by WP:MINOR). If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 18:59, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Copyright concerns
Hello. I'm afraid that a contributor has raised some very valid copyright concerns about Either/Or, as it seems you have placed extensive quotations into the article from translations dating to the late 1980s and after. Since the United States law that governs Wikipedia does grant copyright to new translations of public domain works, we will need to determine the copyright status of these translations in order to publish the article as it is now. Otherwise, the quotes will need to be vastly diminished to accord with our copyright policy and non-free content policy and guideline. Please see Copy-paste.

Since no information has been provided as to the copyright status of the works, the article has been blanked. If we cannot verify that the material is free of copyright within a week or a rewrite is not proposed at that uses only brief excerpts from the works, it may be necessary to restore the article to an earlier version.

Thank you for any clarification you can provide. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 21:06, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

Categories on sandbox
Hi User:11614soup. I've commented out the categories on your User:11614soup/Philosophy -- hmm sandbox page as it was appearing in Category:Søren Kierkegaard and other categories. This is following the policy at WP:USERPAGES. If and when you are ready to move work from your sandbox into mainspace, just revert my commenting out of the categories. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 10:22, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

I've done the same for your other Kierkegaard sandboxes: User:11614soup/Fear and Trembling, User:11614soup/Two Upbuilding Discourses, 1844, User:11614soup/Two Upbuilding Discourses, 1843, User:11614soup/Repetition (Kierkegaard), User:11614soup/Four Upbuilding Discourses, 1843. Yours, —Tom Morris (talk) 10:36, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

One last thing on Kierkegaard: be aware that the links in your sandboxes point to the old URLs on sorenkierkegaard.org which are now broken. If you plan to move your sandboxes into user space, you might want to fix the links. —Tom Morris (talk) 10:48, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

Talkback
—Tom Morris (talk) 12:18, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Either/Or (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added links to Reflection and Expectation


 * Philosophy of Søren Kierkegaard (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link to Possible

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:21, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Dewandrainweb.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Dewandrainweb.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. mabdul 11:58, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. However, the reviewer felt that a few things need to be fixed before it is accepted. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text to the top of the article.)
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, you can use the edit button at the top of the article, near the search bar
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Help desk or the [ reviewer's talk page]. Alternatively you can ask a reviewer questions via live help
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia!  Nolelover   Talk · Contribs  14:49, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Dewandrainweb.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:Dewandrainweb.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. mabdul 17:02, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Søren Kierkegaard, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Personality (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:32, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Philosophy of Søren Kierkegaard, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Environment (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:45, 29 February 2012 (UTC)