User talk:116redrock

August 2007
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Syria, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 18:18, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
 * I looked over the edit and realize you were using the original name of Paul the Apostle. The agreed upon name is the "Paul" version and not "Saul" because the article I mentioned above uses the "Paul" version.  Sorry that I mistook it as vandalism but for now the "Paul" this saint is referred to on Wikipedia.¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk)  18:22, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 22
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Revenant (2015 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Victoria. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:44, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 21
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited John Macnab, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Christie. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:47, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Scotch whisky
Neither of your changes to the Scotch whisky article (i.e., this and this) are supported by the source that is cited, and you did not provide any WP:edit summary to explain your motivation. The cited source is a particular law that we are describing in the article – there is no ambiguity in what it says. I suggest to please be more careful in the future to check what sources say and to explain what you are trying to do. —BarrelProof (talk) 21:28, 3 August 2017 (UTC)