User talk:117.173.161.82

December 2017
Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of current ships of the United States Navy, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - the WOLF  child  12:55, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Martadinata-class frigate. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. - the WOLF  child  12:58, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, as you did at Sigma-class corvette, you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. 'Stop dumping your supposed refs in the edit summary. Attach them properly to your changes. Use the edit summary to actually explain what your doing. Stop expecting others to do your work for you. - the WOLF ' child  13:02, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. 'Constantly re-reverting edits, adding no sources, adding no summary, you are well on your way to edit-warring. Stop, add your edits properly, or discuss them on a talk page... any talk page. Stop disrupting the project. - the WOLF ' child  13:07, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your recent editing history at Martadinata-class frigate shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. - the WOLF  child  14:17, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Sigma-class corvette. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. - the WOLF  child  14:18, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

BRD
This is your opportunity to explain your reverts, and discuss your edits. Thus far, you have refused to communicate, to even provide edit summaries, (except what might be sources...? but I don't know, you didn't explain or add them to your edits. You have violated 3RR in 2 different articles, and appears you deliberately logged out to edit as well. There is also the matter the RJDVZYR & RJDVDYR accounts. I'm not sure if this is a language barrier, a competency issue or if you're just being difficult, but this is disruptive behavior. It could be reported and you could be blocked from editing. So instead, how about to say something, anything, to help explain your actions, ok? - the WOLF  child  14:26, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The discussion can be found here. Thank you. - the WOLF  child  15:16, 18 December 2017 (UTC)