User talk:117.175.68.76

August 2018
Hello, I'm GrapefruitSculpin. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, Austal, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. →‎ GS →‎ ☎ → 09:43, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

Do not use multiple IP addresses to vandalize Wikipedia, like you did at Austal. Such attempts to avoid detection or circumvent the blocking policy will not succeed. You are welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia but your recent edits have been reverted or removed. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia '''you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Suspected relation: Special:Contributions/60.255.184.209 →‎ GS''' →‎ ☎ → 09:44, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Austal, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. →‎ GS →‎ ☎ → 10:20, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Austal. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. →‎ GS →‎ ☎ → 10:25, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

Your recent edits to Austal
@ 117.175.68.76: You said: Austal USA website isn't reliable source？ Austal's website is a reliable source for their own founding date. The problem is it took you 3-4 attempts before bringing it up and then didn't even add it to the article. An edit summary is not sufficient. The other issue, is you keep changing the intl= parameter to no. Being an Australian company, they use the International Financial Reporting Standards, therefore your changes have been incorrect. ''I just read that the intl parameter has been deprecated from use in that template per this discussion. My apologies for that.''

You can read about how to use that specific infobox here: Template:infobox company. You can get a quick understanding of sourcing requirements on en.Wikipedia here: WP:PROVEIT. This line is particularly important: All content must be verifiable. The burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material, and is satisfied by providing an inline citation to a reliable source that directly supports the contribution. →‎ GS →‎ ☎ → 10:36, 16 August 2018 (UTC)