User talk:117.194.231.255

December 2020
Hello, I'm 331dot. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Tipu Sultan that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. 331dot (talk) 15:19, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

Expression of religious bigotry will not be tolerated; you will be blocked should it continue. Leave the attacks at home and focus on the content. You have no way of knowing who is at the other end of the computer. 331dot (talk) 15:21, 6 December 2020 (UTC)


 * I have made NO comment on the page/article itself. I re-added something that was removed by the editor that is VERY well-referenced in the following sentences in the same paragraph. I said what I did in the summary and and while I know it is uncivil as per WIKI it is 100% true if you have a look at the editor's Wiki history. This [] is his edit. He says he tagged a statement in the summary which you seem to attach so much value to. And in reality he removed an assertion. An assertion that is well supported in the following paragraph. Here [] he adds a reference from WORDPRESS. His profile since he came two months ago on WIKI is replete with removals of what he does not like even if referenced, deceptive summaries, even while adding iffy claims and (non-)citations himself.


 * At the other end of which computer??? Whether I should "leave the attacks at home" is NONE of your business. Honestly I puke at the way *some* American settler-turned-citizens cry "islamophobia". Sitting on 100% stolen land after carrying out a genocide ten times worse than the Holocaust over centuries, and till last year celebrating the first genocider's birthday proudly every year as a holiday, and then embezzling another half of an old country to the South as "indemnity" for a war wrongfully imposed on them, and now calling the natives of that part of the stolen land "illegal" even while they have been there from long before 1848 and before these settler-turned-citizens had stopped sleeping on rocks back in Western Europe, and dropping the only atom bombs of recorded history. What is more, even when it comes to Muslims, we can see the "love" all the way from Libya to Sudan to Iraq to Syria.


 * My mere use of the ONE word "shameless" is uncivil to you? Or is it "islamist"??? Several WIKI articles use that word as well as others like radicals and extremists for this lot. And my use of that term was ONLY in the summary. There must have been a reason why I used it. It was NOT solely on the basis of that edit that I was reverting. The uncivil tone of the summary cannot ever diminish the the authenticity of the information that is put in.

117.194.231.255 (talk) 16:12, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
 * For some reason you seem to have a lot of anger and resentment of other users; that will make things very difficult for you here should it continue. Wikipedia editors are not responsible for all the current problems in the world or the actions of their ancestors. You should not be taking out your anger on them.  You said "shameless islamist who is masquerading as a Hindu"; you don't know for certain if the person on the other end of the computer who made that edit is a Muslim or a Christian or an atheist.  If you wish to have religious bigotry, that is your business, but you will not express it here on Wikipedia.  This is a collaborative environment where people from around the world of differing races, religions, national origin, and genders work together to create an encyclopedia of human knowledge. If you are unable to work collaboratively in a civil manner, you should not participate here. 331dot (talk) 17:18, 6 December 2020 (UTC)