User talk:117.204.163.100

February 2022
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Hyperconjugation, you may be blocked from editing. DMacks (talk) 10:57, 20 February 2022 (UTC)


 * To clarify, as our article does, "The Baker–Nathan effect, sometimes used synonymously for hyperconjugation, is a specific application of it to certain chemical reactions or types of structures." They observed an effect or certain scope/instance of it, but it's not clear (and cited refs don't seem to support) that it was the full concept of hyperconjugation as we now know it (for example Mulliken's work later). That's I assume why it's "sometimes used synonymously" rather than an actual exact synonym. There's probably a way to work their historical invovement in with a clearer wording that matches the apparent actual situation. DMacks (talk) 11:05, 20 February 2022 (UTC)