User talk:117.205.195.236

September 2019
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Mathura. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:44, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 * It was not vandalism instead you are pushing POV edits that I am preventing. Wikipedia is free content, everybody is free to edit wikipedia in constructive manner. Your edits seems disruptive and you are preventing anyone from editing any page in any constructive manner. 117.205.195.236 (talk) 16:48, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Most city/town articles have a separate section for festivals. Since Mathura is religiously inclined, that section can very well be expanded in future. And do not edit war and do not put unreliable sources. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:51, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Can you show me which page has such formatting?. Read Mecca, it has pilgrimage section below history. You are without explanation pushing it down to deliberately make the section insignificant. 117.205.195.236 (talk) 16:55, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
 * You added a wikilinked section, I on the other hand arranged it properly. You can't add a subsection within a section, when you have things related to Hinduism both above and below the subsection you created. That breaks the section - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:57, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
 * As for arrangements, most Indian city articles have History, Geography and demographics at the top. See Allahabad. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:58, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep it seprate then but. I am putting the Geography and Demographics section below the section as it was before you shifted them as I hope we can reach the status Quo as page was. 117.205.195.236 (talk) 17:00, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
 * the Mecca article you mentioned has 'Government' mentioned above 'Pilgrimage'. And the Culture section, which talks about the religious heritage and number of pilgrims is much below. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:04, 14 September 2019 (UTC)

Man, you really should not edit when we are discussing. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:07, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
 * It has that even on top of history section. I have no problem if you put anything above history section. Just keep History section and Religious significance section in a linear manner one after another. And what about Medina? Both those pages has one think strikingly similar that Religious significance/pilgrimage section is relatively on top after history/overview section while you unreasonably pushing it down for Mathura? 117.205.195.236 (talk) 17:16, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Hmm.. OK. I can agree with that kind of an arrangement. My arrangements were based on most major Indian city articles, which typically had things like Etymology, History, Geography, Demographics above all else. See Patna. Even Gaya, India has administration above, pilgrimage. It is moot now since I've kinda agreed to your arrangements. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:26, 14 September 2019 (UTC)