User talk:117.206.88.136

Zomato
Hello, I'm 12.189.124.50. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia.
 * Go ahead, block me then. Oh wait. LOL.


 * I gave you the forth and final warning as after this I will complain you to noticeboard if you continue to make disrupting edits including removing of sourced contents, references and adding one sided information. Your IP may be reported to Jabalpur Police as well. --12.189.124.50 (talk) 21:53, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep threatening me and you may get blocked for failure to disclose COI.
 * threatening ? You have been making disruptive edits which is pretty clear from your edit history. Why don't you disclose your COI? 12.189.124.50 (talk) 21:56, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
 * WP:NPLT you are harrassing me and posting legal threats on my talk page (Jabalpur Police threat)
 * Do not try to play a victim card. You should explain your disruptive edits and why you should not be blocked? 12.189.124.50 (talk) 22:04, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Stop hounding my talk page.
 * Can you please STOP Victim playing? You have been responding me and suddenly asking me to Stop hounding? 12.189.124.50 (talk) 22:11, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
 * 12.189.124.50, Ma'am, you have said that plenty of times already. CLCStudent (talk) 22:13, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
 * I stopped editing the article at 21:46 and responding to you at 21:56, but at 22:11 even 15 minutes later you keep harassing and hounding me here despite telling you to stop doing so. And let's not forget the legal threat you have issued above.

August 2019
Your recent editing history at Zomato shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. CLCStudent (talk) 22:06, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 * Thank you. I have stopped editing the page. Can you take a look at the "controversies" section of the article and remove text which is not related to the company?


 * What makes you believe user:12.189.124.50 is a paid editor? CLCStudent (talk) 22:24, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
 * I don't know if they are being paid to edit that section, but it does look like they are trying to mask the controversy by sandwiching it between unrelated stuff like some Twitter response which "faced mostly praises" and some customer being issued a notice by the police.