User talk:117.211.84.74

November 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Kernel (computing) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. rubicon | talk 17:36, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

December 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Yamunanagar, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Yamunanagar was changed by 117.211.84.74 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.956261 on 2010-12-06T11:06:08+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:06, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Yamunanagar. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:12, 6 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Nuvola apps important.svg Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. We hope (talk) 06:54, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

January 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Ror, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Ror was changed by 117.211.84.74 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.981142 on 2011-01-14T05:36:40+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 05:36, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

February 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to The Most Interesting Man in the World, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: The Most Interesting Man in the World was changed by 117.211.84.74 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.954532 on 2011-02-03T09:35:31+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:35, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

February 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Wheatstone bridge, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Wheatstone bridge was changed by 117.211.84.74 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.967449 on 2011-02-07T05:30:05+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 05:30, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Wheatstone bridge constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to remove content without explanation. Thank you. ... disco spinster   talk  05:31, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at National Service Scheme, you will be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: National Service Scheme was changed by 117.211.84.74 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.893074 on 2011-02-07T06:56:23+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 06:56, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

April 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Indira Gandhi with this edit, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Reaper Eternal (talk) 12:41, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

June 2011
Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page IOS version history worked, and it has been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. bou·le·var·dier (talk) 09:13, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2011
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Heterochromatin with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. S PARKZY  16:09, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

October 2011
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! I edit Wikipedia too, under the username Wtmitchell. I noticed that one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Sarao with this edit, appeared to be unconstructive, and I’ve reverted it. In the future, please use the sandbox for testing and be sure to provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Please feel free to ask me questions about editing Wikipedia (or anything else) on my talk page. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 04:30, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Sarao, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. --Davejohnsan (talk) 04:42, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

December 2011
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Public sector, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Ramaksoud2000 (talk) 06:46, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

January 2012
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Ror with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 05:58, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ahirwal with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 06:00, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Kurukshetra with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Jim1138 (talk) 08:18, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced content, as you did to Ambala district. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Muhandes (talk) 19:41, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2012
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to List of Gurjar clans, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Willdude123 18:32, 5 February 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Willdude123 (talk • contribs)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or  located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 11:36, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

Use of talk pages
Please note that the purpose of the talk pages are to discuss improvements to the related articles. I have reverted a couple of your edits to various talk pages which just posted a link with no explanation of how the link was to be used to improve the article. For more information, please read the following pages: Please let me know if you have any questions. Singularity42 (talk) 13:06, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
 * WP:TALK
 * Identifying reliable sources

October 2012
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Electronic commerce, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. ''

This also applies to your reverted unexpected blanking of content and templates from Control (management). bonadea'' contributions talk 11:17, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2012
Hello, I'm Rocketrod1960. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Company secretary because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Rocketrod1960 06:59, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2013
Hello, I'm Lova Falk. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Observer-expectancy effect seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Lova Falk    talk   09:34, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2013
Hello, I'm Eyesnore. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to The Attacks of 26/11 because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page.  Eye snore  (pending changes) 18:09, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/IASIR-International Association of Scientific Innovation and Research concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/IASIR-International Association of Scientific Innovation and Research, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 18:24, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

October 2013
Hello, I'm Jeffrd10. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Sport in India because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Jeffrd10 (talk) 12:42, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Decoder. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Materialscientist (talk) 13:03, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Recent edits to Oligodendrocyte
Hello, and thank you for your recent contributions. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit(s) because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! Atethnekos (Discussion, Contributions) 05:17, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

November 2013
Hello, I'm Widr. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Isostasy because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Widr (talk) 05:15, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at MicroRNA. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Pinethicket (talk) 18:14, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/IASIR-International Association of Scientific Innovation and Research


A tag has been placed on Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/IASIR-International Association of Scientific Innovation and Research requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.iasir.net/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. &mdash;Anne Delong (talk) 22:40, 28 December 2013 (UTC)