User talk:117.216.166.242

November 2019
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Tulu language, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Begoon 07:29, 18 November 2019 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Tulu language, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Begoon 07:31, 18 November 2019 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Tulu language. Begoon 07:33, 18 November 2019 (UTC)

Tulu language
See the history of Tulu language article. Tulu is spoken in the region of Tulunadu.

Kanara is not the region where Tulu is spoken. Kanara include Uttara Kannada(North Canara which has nothing to do with Tulu language. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.216.166.242 (talk) 07:38, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
 * What you say may be true. That doesn't make any difference to the fact that you cannot remove existing content without an adequate explanation, and you cannot add content without adding supporting reliable sources. Read WP:RS and WP:REFB. If you make good edits supported by reliable sources you will have no problems - if you continue to make unexplained, unsourced changes you are likely to be blocked. -- Begoon 07:42, 18 November 2019 (UTC)

Some people with propaganda have changed the article to include spoken regions from Tulunadu to Kanara. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.216.166.242 (talk) 07:47, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
 * As I said above, if you make good edits supported by reliable sources you will have no problems - if you continue to make unexplained, unsourced changes you are likely to be blocked. Pointing vaguely at other articles in conversation is no use - all your content must be reliably sourced so that it is verifiable by readers. From your "propaganda" comment I also recommend reading WP:Righting great wrongs. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a battleground. -- Begoon 07:50, 18 November 2019 (UTC)

You have blindly reversed my edits while I made some grammatical and technical corrections which does not require source. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.216.166.242 (talk) 08:24, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
 * I didn't "blindly reverse" anything - I'm not a mind reader and neither are our readers - I reverted unexplained changes (not grammar corrections at all). Your last couple of edits have had an explanation and a source... thank you. A bit like pulling teeth, and you very nearly got yourself blocked by ignoring every warning up until the last one, but it's a move in the right direction. Source and explain all your edits and life will be lovely. Please learn to WP:SIGN and WP:INDENT your posts on talk pages. Thank you. -- Begoon 09:11, 18 November 2019 (UTC)