User talk:117.218.187.233

September 2020
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Force_Motors. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Thepesar (talk) 10:19, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

October 2020
Hello, I'm Transcendental36. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Serum Institute of India, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a messageInfo on my talk page.   Transcendental36 (talk) 14:07, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Serum Institute of India. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges.

  Transcendental36 (talk) 14:11, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Serum Institute of India, you may be blocked from editing. Materialscientist (talk) 14:19, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

Mistaken warning removed. Sorry. — Blablubbs (talk • contribs) 14:25, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at H3h3Productions. Bmf 051 (talk) 19:38, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Asda
Hi - Walmart is still the owner pending regulatory approval and the sale concluding. If you are of a different view please raise on the article talk page rather than changing ownership in the infobox to the Issa Brothers. Thank you. Dormskirk (talk) 16:25, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

March 2021
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to TAI/AgustaWestland T129 ATAK, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. -Fnlayson (talk) 21:26, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to PNS Ghazi, you may be blocked from editing. ~ Aseleste  (t, e &#124; c, l) 16:52, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia. OhNo itsJamie Talk 20:05, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

April 2021
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Boeing AH-64 Apache, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. -Fnlayson (talk) 12:37, 22 April 2021 (UTC)