User talk:117.246.188.239

You get some kinda kick outta being an admin don't you? Given what's been said, the onus is now on you to say why any of the blocks were justified. Just because you're an admin, you don't get to make proclamations like "It doesn't matter if the block was legitimat". And please understand that statements like "this is the end of the line for you" are neither true nor useful. I'm doing this only to get the edit filter removed. It's not like you've unpermitted me from editing the entire English Wikipedia or anything like that. I can ALWAYS edit something unrelated.


 * "Blocked users can continue to access Wikipedia, but cannot edit any page (including their own user pages), except (in most cases) their own user talk pages.", "User accounts or IP addresses used to evade a block should also be blocked."

 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ creation log] • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]) )

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.