User talk:118.36.229.221

December 2012
It may not have been your intention, but one of your edits, specifically one that you made on Individualism, may have introduced material that some consider controversial. Due to this, your edits may have been reverted. When adding material that may be controversial, it is good practice to first discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them, in order to gain consensus over whether or not to include, phrasing, etc. If you believe that the information you added was correct, please initiate that discussion. Thank you. Salvidrim!  12:22, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You've also repeatedly removed another user's comments from the article's talk page -- please note it is very strongly discouraged to alter comments from other users. You are free to disagree, and even reply, but removing it on these grounds is unacceptable. Even worse is removing it repeatedly, as you did, which is also not proper editing behaviour. Also please make sure that you do not engage in discussions through edit summaries; discussions should be held on talk pages, that's what they're here for! I hope this clarifies things a bit. Also, be aware the case has been brought to WP:AN/I. Salvidrim!  12:37, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or  located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 13:39, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

January 2013
You have been blocked from editing for a short time for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Black Kite (talk) 14:19, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Do you wish to block me?
If you wish to block me because I, again, removed content in violation of the 3 revert rule, note that I have attempted to flag the content instead. However, the wiki-markup does not seem to allow tags on the category links. I elected to remove it instead because 1) it is in violation of WP:IRS,  2) I have asked the other users to engage me on the talk page, and they have refused, 3) asked for advice  4) other attempts to flag the content have failed due to limitations of the Wiki-markup.

Please don't block me again. I'm trying abide by Wikipedia's policies and move this dispute in a positive direction.--118.36.229.221 (talk) 11:49, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
 * If you edit war again, you will be blocked again. This is a promise. --jpgordon:==( o ) 15:59, 8 January 2013 (UTC)