User talk:118.69.96.63

August 2021
Hello, I'm Rdp060707. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Dazed, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Rdp060707&#124;talk 08:02, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Rdp060707&#124;talk 08:05, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced or original content. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Rdp060707&#124;talk 08:07, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Dazed shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Seloloving (talk) 08:14, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bui Quoc Huy (August 18)
 Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Bui_Quoc_Huy Articles for creation help desk] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by SounderBruce was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

 Sounder Bruce  08:13, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

Dazed
Hello IP 118.69.96.63. Please do not add back the material on Dazed without a reliable, independent source. Continuing to add it would be in violation of the three revert rule, which will get you banned. As you are a new editor, I do not wish to pursue that option. Please do discuss it here on the article's talkpage if you wish to discuss it. Seloloving (talk) 08:19, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

Hello Seloloving (talk)I will learn from my experience next time so that my edits do not make mistakes, thanks for the reminder