User talk:118.93.255.82

May 2010
Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Brendon McCullum worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you. NotAnonymous0 did I err?|Contribs 04:59, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2022
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Lord Haw-Haw, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Mako001 (C) (T)  🇺🇦 21:32, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Lord Haw-Haw. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. Mako001 (C) (T)  🇺🇦 21:34, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

April 2022
Hello, I'm Pingumeister. Your recent edit(s) to the page Richard Feynman appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been reverted for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. -- Pingumeister(talk) 11:14, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Igor and Grichka Bogdanoff shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. StarryGrandma (talk) 22:46, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Big History, you may be blocked from editing.  dizzy flamingo  (talk) 04:52, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Lens flare. StarryGrandma (talk) 22:55, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

May 2022
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Lindt Cafe siege. —MelbourneStar ☆ talk 08:54, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.  Spencer T• C 06:39, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Akber mamps  04:17, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.