User talk:119.160.97.178

July 2018
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Illegal taxicab operation has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:17, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Illegal taxicab operation was changed by 119.160.97.178 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.903358 on 2018-07-24T23:17:07+00:00.

September 2018
Hello, I'm CAPTAIN RAJU. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Yūrei have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 12:09, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2020
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Khadim Hussain Rizvi has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:47, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Khadim Hussain Rizvi was changed by 119.160.97.178 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.876472 on 2020-11-29T02:47:25+00:00

Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Khadim Hussain Rizvi. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Please review MOS:PBUH. Thank you. GorillaWarfare (talk) 02:51, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add Islamic honorifics to articles, as you did at Khadim Hussain Rizvi, you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia guideline on Islamic honorifics, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Gatemansgc (TɅ̊LK) 02:53, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make disruptive edits to Wikipedia contrary to the Manual of Style, as you did at Khadim Hussain Rizvi. Rdp060707 (Your questions?/My fight against the devil) 02:52, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your recent editing history at Khadim Hussain Rizvi shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Rdp060707 (Your questions?/My fight against the devil) 02:56, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.  Spencer T• C 03:30, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.