User talk:119.160.97.31

July 2016
Hello, I'm MorbidEntree. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to 49, XXXXX have been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. MorbidEntree-(Talk to me! (っ◕‿◕)っ♥) (Contribs) (please reply using ) 19:18, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to TASS has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:32, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: TASS was changed by 119.160.97.31 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.903268 on 2016-08-23T12:32:15+00:00.

August 2017
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Partition of India. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 14:21, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2020
Hello, I'm I dream of horses. An edit you recently made to Kamangar seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. I dream of horses (t) (c) Remember to &#123;&#123;ping&#125;&#125; me after replying off my talk page 23:33, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

March 2021
Hello, I'm RandomCanadian. I noticed that you recently removed content from Sipah-e-Sahaba Pakistan without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page.   RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 03:04, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.