User talk:119.173.81.176/Archive 36

Your edits
You should really discuss the changes you wish to make before you start this again. - 4twenty42o (talk) 07:34, 3 November 2009 (UTC)


 * I don't think removing original research and undue weight requires discussion, neither does adding notable information. 119.173.81.176 (talk) 07:35, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
 * You are removing actual sourced information. Discuss it on the talk pages, and in the meantime read the sources given - they actually support the text you're removing. As it is you seem to be acting to be creating undue weight yourself by implying that somehow the thousands of reports of groping are all false, an implication not supported by the sources given. It is undue weight to imply that there are significant doubts when reliable sources do not show any significant doubt. --NellieBly (talk) 07:42, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
 * I am not implying anything, I am stating that the article is about groping, if you want so much information about Chikan, then create a Chikan article. It is not a chikan article, neither is it an article about groping in Japan. 119.173.81.176 (talk) 08:17, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

It is not possible for me to remove my comments from another person's user page, as that page belongs to that owner. I have redacted them and made them unintelligible solely to stop you from posting to my user page. I am disengaging from this; please do not respond. --NellieBly (talk) 17:41, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Hello 119.173. This page is still on my watchlist due to some previous 3RR case about automatic transmissions. Now I see that Groping is an issue. I saw the word 'vandalism' being used, and that made me nervous. Also there seems to be some kind of very tense discussion going on. Permit me to observe that neither nor User:NellieBly have yet made any comments at Talk:Groping. If the Groping article is the source of the disagreement, and if the issue is ever posted for admins to look at, the lack of those comments will be conspicuous. Also, if there are any personal attacks made in non-English alphabets it will set off alarm bells. Please work this out as you think best, but some of these things could be easily fixed (I think) with a bit of patience and good faith. EdJohnston (talk) 18:06, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
 * fair comments, things were getting a little tense - I was not particually happy with my comments being dismissed and deleted from user talk pages without being addressed, neither was I happy with being called "baka" (japanese for idiot) in a edit summary, nor was I happy about being branded "a known IP vandal" but I guess I cannot expect everyone on here to be polite to me every time. 119.173.81.176 (talk) 04:37, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

November 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to User talk:Kintetsubuffalo, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Oda Mari (talk) 18:00, 3 November 2009 (UTC)


 * What can I do for you? I did not realize I deleted a message from you. - 4twenty42o (talk) 22:57, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

Removal of talk page comments
I looked at the talk page comments that you removed, and they are not personal attacks, so I restored them. Please don't remove them again. Cla68 (talk) 04:42, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

ATV
Then discuss it on the talk and stop removing cited material. - 4twenty42o (talk) 04:54, 4 November 2009 (UTC) Don't stalk me, and if you are going suggest that I use the talk page, use it yourself. 119.173.81.176 (talk) 04:55, 4 November 2009 (UTC)


 * You have been repeatedly asked not to remove content without discussing it. You continue to remove cited ref'd material I will continue to revert you. - 4twenty42o (talk) 04:57, 4 November 2009 (UTC)


 * I did discuss it - as you are obviously following me and taking great interest in my edit history, I am suprised that you did not notice the message I left on the other user's talk page regarding my content removal. (oh, and stop following me please) 119.173.81.176 (talk) 04:58, 4 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Wait for a consensus and edit responsibly within wiki guidelines and ill not bother you ever again. Keep arbitrarily removing content and ill be there. - 4twenty42o (talk) 05:00, 4 November 2009 (UTC)


 * I will bite my tongue and not comment on the above comments that are threatening to stalk me and edit war. 119.173.81.176 (talk) 05:01, 4 November 2009 (UTC)


 * I am not threatening you or stalking you. If you feel that I am threatening or stalking you I suggest you file a report with AN/I. - 4twenty42o (talk) 05:02, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

Keep on following my edits and I will do. Are you aware that my edit that you reverted did not remove those links, but merely placed them in the external links section? I guess you didn't notice that, in your hurry to revert me in order to prove a point. 119.173.81.176 (talk) 05:04, 4 November 2009 (UTC)


 * I'll be expecting notification of that AN/I then... - 4twenty42o (talk) 05:05, 4 November 2009 (UTC)


 * I hope not, I hope that you are more concerned with the quality of wikipedia than with reverting me, I also assume that you are sensible enough not to follow me to any other articles and revert me elsewhere. I do try to assume good faith, even when it proves to be difficult. 119.173.81.176 (talk) 05:08, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

You are blocked for 3 hrs - you need to slow down and stop being so confrontational
Another editor asked for help with you, and I have reviewed your contributions today. You need to stop this. I am blocking you for 3 hours to try and stop the immediate damage, though I hope that you can contribute constructively going forwards.

The comments you left and behavior including talk page comment removals on User talk:Kintetsubuffalo were in violation of Wikipedia policy and rude. He was not right to insult you with Baka - however, that said, the other comments were not personal attacks, you do not have any standing to remove them from his talk page, and edit warring with him and others on his talk page is disrespectful to them and everyone else involved. We expect editors to behave like adults and respect each other. Kintetsubuffalo is a human being - as are you. We expect you to treat each other as such.

The 4twenty42o editor interactions above also were not sufficient justification for you to claim he's stalking you. You have run around a bunch of articles pushing buttons, making changes which are very controversial for some reason or another - many of which you have pushed before over the last few months, and which you have not been materially engaged in discussing on article talk pages.

Making a bold change once is fine. If people complain, Wikipedia policy and our community standards are for you to discuss it with other editors on article or user talk pages, rather than keep warring content back and forth. That has been communicated to you before. I am repeating it again now. We expect you to abide by those standards and policies. If you keep edit warring on articles and don't discuss adequately on talk, that's a violation of WP:EDITWAR and something for which longer blocks on editing are imposed.

Please slow down - calm down - treat the other editors who are interacting with you with respect and assume that they are acting in good faith for the good of the encyclopedia. We assume your good faith as well - but you are pushing far harder than is ok here, at the moment.

Thank you. Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 06:06, 4 November 2009 (UTC)


 * I'm a stubborn idiot at times, but you're right - no matter how strongly I feel about an edit, discussing it once people make it clear that they don't agree certainly wouldn't hurt and would probably make people more likely to see me in a better light. Thanks for the input and thanks for the short length of my editing block. 119.173.81.176 (talk) 13:38, 4 November 2009 (UTC)