User talk:119.74.173.81

September 2021
Hello, I'm Robertsky. I noticed that you removed topically-relevant content from Soh Rui Yong. However, Wikipedia is not censored. Please do not remove or censor information that directly relates to the subject of the article. If the content in question involves images, you have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide images that you may find offensive. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. – robertsky (talk) 00:16, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

Please do not remove information from articles, as you did to Soh Rui Yong. Wikipedia is not censored, and content is not removed on the sole grounds of perceived offensiveness. Please discuss this issue on the article's talk page to reach consensus rather than continuing to remove the disputed material. If the content in question involves images, you also have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide the images that you may find offensive. Thank you. – robertsky (talk) 05:45, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Soh Rui Yong ‎ shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. – robertsky (talk) 05:52, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Soh Rui Yong, you may be blocked from editing. --TheImaCow (talk) 19:15, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. – robertsky (talk) 02:08, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

October 2021
This is the only warning you will receive about ownership of articles, which you showed at Soh Rui Yong. The next time you continue to disruptively edit Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. – robertsky (talk) 21:24, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising again, as you did at Soh Rui Yong, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. – robertsky (talk) 15:32, 24 October 2021 (UTC)