User talk:119.93.40.241

Welcome!
Hello! I noticed your contributions to ABS-CBN franchise renewal controversy&#32;and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. You are welcome to edit anonymously; however, creating an account is free and has several benefits (for example, the ability to create pages, upload media and edit without one's IP address being visible to the public).

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Allenjambalaya (talk) 08:15, 9 May 2020 (UTC)

May 2020
Hello, I'm Allenjambalaya. I noticed that you recently removed content from ABS-CBN franchise renewal controversy without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Allenjambalaya (talk) 08:19, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Philippine English, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Jesuschristposed (talk) 08:59, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

New message from Allenjambalaya
Allenjambalaya (talk) 03:19, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

Incivility
Good day! I dropped by your talkpage to call your attention to your edits at Ivana Alawi, specifically this. Your removal of the row for studio and and network is one thing, you cussing me out is another. I get it, you have your network loyalty, but it's fallacious to say that noting the network is formenting "network wars". The onky intent of noting them is simply that, to note them. There aren't any indication of any slant towards one network or the other right? That's because, if you've been reviewing the rules of Wikipedia, articles are supposed to be written from a neutral point of view. Wikipedia does not care about the network wars, but it certainly cares about facts. That those shows are in one network are just that, facts, and should not be read as a "network war".

And then there's the "go fuck yourself" comment. I'd let it slide for now, but do it again and I'd be forced to report you. Warmest regards Gardo Versace (talk) 14:39, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

Edit warring behavior in ABS-CBN franchise renewal controversy
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

This is the 5th time you have tagged the article with POV, without responding to the discussion in the talk page. We want to build consensus, not engage in edit warring. Please address your concerns to the talk page, where editors have tagged you in the discussions. Thank you. Quidquidlatetadparebit (talk) 17:33, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

May 2020
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Hiwilms (talk) 17:36, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

Edit warring on Ivana Alawi
Your recent editing history at Ivana Alawi shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Gardo Versace (talk) 17:37, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

May 2020
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Black Kite (talk) 18:25, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

October 2021
Hello, I'm Ctrlwiki. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Balitang A2Z, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Ctrlwiki (talk) 04:51, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
 * j if it needs a citation why don't you add it yourself? Don't remove content just because you're too lazy to verify. 119.93.40.241 (talk) 05:18, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Balitang A2Z, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.

Warning
Your recent editing history at Balitang A2Z shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Ctrlwiki (talk) 05:44, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

Reminder
Wikipedia isn't the place to post thoughts from the "netizens". This is an encyclopedia, not a public forum or blog.TheHotwiki (talk) 05:45, 19 October 2021 (UTC)