User talk:119.94.165.243

September 2022
Hello, I'm TylerBurden. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Anna Lindh have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. TylerBurden (talk) 20:45, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Adakiko (talk) 09:27, 9 September 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Yam Concepcion, you may be blocked from editing. Adakiko (talk) 09:37, 9 September 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you blank out or remove content from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Yam Concepcion. Adakiko (talk) 09:40, 9 September 2022 (UTC)


 * Please don't keep adding that David Amess and Jo Cox were assassinated, as this is against the consensus of previous discussions. Also, please follow WP:BRD and use the talk page when edits are reverted.-- ♦Ian Ma c M♦  (talk to me) 06:23, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

There is clear consensus to avoid the use of the word "assassination" on this article. Please read the FAQ at Talk:Murder of David Amess. Further disruptive edits may lead to a block, for both disruptive editing and violation of the three revert rule. MIDI (talk) 09:55, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 60 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Daniel Case (talk) 18:58, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia. FMSky (talk) 10:53, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 13:16, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 6 months for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. HJ Mitchell &#124; Penny for your thoughts? 06:17, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Hello, I'm Adakiko. I noticed that in this edit to Meena Keshwar Kamal, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 06:32, 29 September 2022 (UTC)