User talk:119.94.166.215

January 2024
Hello, I'm Waxworker. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Moka's Fabulous Adventures!, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Waxworker (talk) 15:33, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Oggy Oggy. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. —*Fehufangą (✉ Talk · ✎ Contribs) 10:38, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Moka's Fabulous Adventures!, you may be blocked from editing. Waxworker (talk) 12:33, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Moka's Fabulous Adventures!. Waxworker (talk) 17:10, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 05:18, 22 January 2024 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:37, 22 January 2024 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for disruptive editing, still. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. El_C 04:56, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of The Adventures of Bernie for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Adventures of Bernie is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/The Adventures of Bernie& until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Queen of Hearts 13:46, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

February 2024
Hello, I'm Zsohl. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Oggy Oggy—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Zsohl (Talk) 10:09, 27 February 2024 (UTC)