User talk:12.10.180.106

January 2021
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Flowers for Algernon—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 16:02, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Satchel Paige. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. - Kevo327 (talk) 20:41, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Satchel Paige, you may be blocked from editing. Echoedmyron (talk) 23:38, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you attempt to make unconstructive edits and trigger the edit filter. CLCStudent (talk) 19:52, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2021
Hello, I'm DuncanHill. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to History of Scandinavia have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. DuncanHill (talk) 19:02, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Traditional education. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:45, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Traditional education was changed by 12.10.180.106 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.85032 on 2021-03-03T17:45:15+00:00

Hello, I'm RacoonyRE. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Beaver Wars—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. RacoonyRE (talk) 18:39, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Beaver Wars. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. RacoonyRE (talk) 18:40, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I'm InfiniteNexus. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Alphabet Inc. have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. InfiniteNexus (talk) 19:45, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2021
Hello, I'm Aureum doxadius. I noticed that you recently removed content from Natural material without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Aureum doxadius (talk) 18:10, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

January 2022
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Talk:Albert Einstein, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 15:59, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

February 2022
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Fog have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:42, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Fog was changed by 12.10.180.106 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.918537 on 2022-02-07T19:42:25+00:00

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Trosia nigropunctigera. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Ethan Gaming  7640  19:50, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to attempt to make unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Trosia nigropunctigera, you may be blocked from editing. Daniel Case (talk) 19:54, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Plant symbolism. Serols (talk) 14:35, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours to prevent further vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Hammersoft (talk) 14:41, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

PLEASE DO NOT CONTINUE TO VANDALIZE THE ENCYCLOPEDIA as you did at Elvis Presley singles discography on Feb 10th. We may need to block you again... Oopsemoops (talk) 13:50, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week to prevent further vandalism. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 14:04, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

March 2022
Hello, I'm DoebLoggs. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Leap year have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. DoebLoggs (talk) 14:42, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Cross-dominance, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Ethan Gaming  7640  16:02, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Huey Long—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 15:16, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at High school in the United States, you may be blocked from editing. Severe storm  28  19:51, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Government of Venezuela. Mojo Hand (talk) 14:02, 29 March 2022 (UTC)