User talk:12.109.95.138

February 2020
Hello, I'm Nyook. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Richard Engel, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Nyook  ✉ 20:52, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2020
Hello, I'm CogitoErgoSum14. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Charles M. Blow seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. CogitoErgoSum14 (talk) 20:05, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

February 2021
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Idiocracy, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. '' You may not agree with the content, however is is encyclopaedic and has been verified by independent sources. Please do not remove it without significant consensus.'' — MrConorAE (👤U &#124; 💬T &#124; 📝C) 20:09, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Idiocracy, you may be blocked from editing.   — MrConorAE (👤U &#124; 💬T &#124; 📝C) 20:16, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your recent editing history at Idiocracy shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.  — MrConorAE (👤U &#124; 💬T &#124; 📝C) 20:18, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. Ifnord (talk) 20:21, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Relating to edits to Idiocracy
I understand that you believe that content is not related to the page, but as it has been verified by independent sources (see the citations) and it is relevant because it relates to the film in question, it should be kept. If you think it should be removed, please start a discussion on the talk page of the article and talk about it with other editors. Thank you for trying to improve Wikipedia, — MrConorAE (👤U &#124; 💬T &#124; 📝C) 20:22, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

February 2021
 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing from certain pages (Idiocracy) for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. —C.Fred (talk) 20:27, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

April 2021
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Mark Jones (sportscaster) have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:52, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Mark Jones (sportscaster) was changed by 12.109.95.138 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.885635 on 2021-04-01T21:52:41+00:00

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Mark Jones (sportscaster), you may be blocked from editing.  Go  Phightins  !  22:14, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2021
Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Margaret Carlson—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 16:09, 3 December 2021 (UTC)

February 2022
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ketanji Brown Jackson, you may be blocked from editing. Pachu Kannan (talk) 12:34, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

May 2022
Hello, I'm Lol1VNIO. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person, Andrew Serwer, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. lol1VNIO[not Lol1VNIO] ( I made a mistake? talk to me &#8226; contribs) 17:40, 7 May 2022 (UTC)

June 2022
Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Steve Kerr. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Vaulter 19:24, 2 June 2022 (UTC)


 * Steve Kerr refused to comment on China when asked. Everyone knows Wikipedia is a far left website but damn put the facts in. 12.109.95.138 (talk) 09:51, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

September 2022
Hello, I'm XRENEGADEx. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Aileen Cannon have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. xRENEGADEx ( talk &#124;  contribs ) 10:02, 16 September 2022 (UTC)


 * This help desk question seems relevant.— Vchimpanzee  •  talk  •  contributions  •  22:49, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

November 2022
 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 6 months for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.  Acroterion   (talk)   13:50, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.