User talk:12.130.117.34

August 2015
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Nakon 02:34, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

Hello, I'm JJMC89. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Michael Mike Rossi with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. &mdash;&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·E·C) 02:41, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Michael Mike Rossi with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. &mdash;&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·E·C) 02:50, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Michael Mike Rossi, you may be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Michael Mike Rossi was changed by 12.130.117.34 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.953127 on 2015-08-12T02:51:56+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:51, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

November 2016
Hello, I'm RedPanda25. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to American Marketing Association— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. RedPanda25 00:15, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

Sorry for the confusion, I was just using a list from another page as a template. I think I have fixed it now.

Very Sloppy Research
Hi. This anonymous user has demonstrated some pretty sloppy "facts" that were not researched or verified, and are simply wrong. He or she added "facts" about education early to an article that were clearly wrong, and went uncorrected for a number of years, regarding an entry on a living biographical figure. SUNY at Buffalo (University of Buffalo ), is not affiliated with New York University Center at Buffalo as they write in a particular article. The State University at Buffalo is part of the state university of New York, which has nothing to do with the privately run NYU (or New York University) at all. What that suggests is that probably all of their edits to 2016 (their last edit date) need to be checked for factual inaccuracy... Stevenmitchell (talk) 07:13, 26 May 2019 (UTC)