User talk:12.187.202.162

Phil Ivey
The version you created has too many subcategories and is not proper wikipedia format. If you feel your version is better please discuss overwise it is vandalism. Valoem  talk  14:21, 19 August 2010 (UTC)


 * I notice that you reverted the edit again. You did a great job with David Williams because the verison prior was not in wikipedia format, however the Phil Ivey article is a correct format. Your version has redundant subcategories, please discuss why your version is better. Unlike David Williams Phil Ivey only plays poker no need to distinguish between two games. I am reverting to the original format. Please discuss before reverting. Valoem   talk  14:33, 19 August 2010 (UTC)


 * I created a section in the talk page "Please discuss before changing the format of the article" please input your thoughts there. Valoem   talk  14:36, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

Please stop vandalizing Phil Ivey article
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Phil Ivey, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Valoem  talk  14:47, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Phil Ivey. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Valoem  talk  14:55, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

August 2010
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Phil Ivey, you may be blocked from editing. Valoem  talk  15:09, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been blocked from editing for a short time for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule&#32;at Phil Ivey. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Daniel Case (talk) 15:49, 19 August 2010 (UTC)