User talk:12.2.92.211

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Sus frogs


Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Draft:Sus frogs, to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Helen (💬📖) 18:47, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Sus frogs


Please do not create hoaxes on Wikipedia, as you did at Draft:Sus frogs. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Squeakachu (talk) 19:36, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 20:09, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

March 2022
Hello, I'm Nick Levine. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Steroid have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Nick Levine (talk) 17:32, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Steroid. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Nick Levine (talk) 18:37, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Taxin609. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Taxin 609 ( Talk To Me ) 21:23, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

September 2023
Hello, I'm 64andtim. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to John Cabot have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. signed, 64andtim  ( chat ) 16:37, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contribution(s). I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, while user talk pages permit a small degree of generaliation, other talk pages such as Saci (Brazilian folklore) are strictly for discussing improvements to their associated main pages, and many of them have special instructions on the top. They are not a general discussion forum about the article's topic or any other topic. If you have questions or ideas and are not sure where to post them, consider asking at the Teahouse. Thanks. NotAGenious (talk) 16:47, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

October 2023
Please refrain from attempting to make unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been [ disallowed by an edit filter.] If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeatedly attempting to perform disruptive actions may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 21:29, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

December 2023
Hello, I'm Philipnelson99. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Columbia sheep—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Philipnelson99 (talk) 22:07, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

February 2024
Hello, I'm Synorem. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Secret police have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Synorem (talk) 23:02, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

May 2024
Hello, I'm Yoshi24517. An edit you recently made to The Behemoth seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.  Yoshi24517 ( Chat ) ( Very Busy ) 19:32, 29 May 2024 (UTC)