User talk:12.246.113.186

July 2018
Welcome, and thank you for your attempt to lighten up Wikipedia. However, this is an encyclopedia and articles are intended to be serious, so please don't make joke edits, as you did to Angelique Kerber. Readers looking for accurate information will not find them amusing. If you'd like to experiment with editing, please use the sandbox instead, where you are given a certain degree of freedom in what you write. RafaelS1979 (talk) 16:50, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Angelique Kerber. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 17:06, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

November 2018
Hello, I'm CASSIOPEIA. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Nashville International Airport, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 16:54, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

Chinese alligator
Hey there! First of all, thank you very much for the copy-edits you have been making to the Chinese alligator; most of them are very helpful and constructive to the page. I'm trying to improve and expand the article as much as possible and will eventually nominate it for good article status, so it's nice to have someone along to fix the dumb typos I make. However, I've reverted several of the copy-edits you made to the article for a variety of reasons. I would usually explain the reasoning in my edit summary, but because the reasons are quite long and numerous as well as the fact that you won't be notified if I just leave an edit summary, I figured I'd leave a message here explaining my reasoning for the reverts. The reasons for the reverting of the individual copy-edits you made are as follows:


 * Life cycle is much more commonly used than Lifecycle. After doing a Google search, all dictionaries, reliable newspapers, etc. refer to it with a space; in biological terms, usage without a space is very uncommon.
 * Two and three should be spelled out as words in most cases per MOS:NUMERAL
 * The International Union for Conservation of Nature, as far as I know, should be spelled out in its first appearance in the body (i.e. not including the lead). Many readers may have no clue what the random words IUCN mean, especially because you removed the link
 * Four and five should also be words per MOS:NUMERAL
 * I've changed "alerts the adult females" back to "alerts the adult female." The source that follows the information, this book, states that "full-term embryos will give these 'hatching calls' from within the egg as a signal for the female to open the nest." Wikipedia provides information that is already in reliable sources forverifiability; because the reference in this particular circumstance uses "female" in singular, that's what we should use.
 * Curly quotes shouldn't be used per WP:QUOTEMARK

This isn't a "do better next time" message but just a chance to explain my reasons for reverting when I don't have enough room, and am not able to notify you, in an edit summary. Thanks!-- SkyGazer 512 Oh no, what did I do this time? 04:55, 28 December 2018 (UTC)

March 2019
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Darius Garland has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:17, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Darius Garland was changed by 12.246.113.186 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.905569 on 2019-03-02T18:17:07+00:00

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Darius Garland, you may be blocked from editing. John from Idegon (talk) 18:35, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2021
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Lauren Jauregui, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 00:48, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

August 2023
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Hands Across the Aisle Coalition, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Schazjmd  (talk)  19:16, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Please also note that if you do find a good source, you should begin on the talk page to gather consensus to change the description in the lead. Schazjmd   (talk)  19:19, 17 August 2023 (UTC)