User talk:12.70.163.10

I am quite unimpressed by this Colonial Williamsburg piece. Bluntly, it seems motivated by sour grapes, e. g., sniping at something about Colonial Williamburg's lack of accuracy. (They think people should relieve themselves in two-holers?? Corn cobs would give them a real feel for colonial life.) At the same time they virtually ignore the extensive and exceptionally authentic demonstration of trades that helped define living in the times, as an example. Life stories of many sorts of people -- most real -- is another example.

I also think CW has done a credible job in dealing with the issues of African-Americans, which is not an easy thing to. In this regard, this piece spends a lot of space in criticism without much support of their position.

Do I know CW? Yes. Do I want to edit? No. I'm not interested in being associated with this sort of offering. I also don't participate in forums for similar reasons.

It is really a tragedy that professionally-edited encyclopedia have disappeared.

12.70.163.10 (talk) 21:01, 22 May 2019 (UTC)