User talk:120.146.185.48

May 2022
Please do not add or change content, as you did at United Firefighters Union of Australia, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Meters (talk) 07:51, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at United Firefighters Union of Australia, you may be blocked from editing. ''Stop doing this. The section does not mention Queensland. The reference does not mention Queensland. There appears to be no reason to add Queensland to the header.'' Meters (talk) 06:51, 17 May 2022 (UTC)


 * This is the third time you have attempted to add unsourced material about the Queensland branch. Either provide reliable sources or leave it alone. And please read WP:EW. Meters (talk) 06:54, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at United Firefighters Union of Australia. Meters (talk) 18:28, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

June 2022
Your recent editing history at United Firefighters Union of Australia shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Meters (talk) 05:06, 2 June 2022 (UTC)