User talk:120.17.64.134

October 2021
Hello, I'm Isabelle Belato. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Andrew Johns—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Isabelle 🔔 22:26, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Andrew Johns. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges.   The Tips of Apmh (talk) 23:49, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Goulash. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. STC1  talk  23:58, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to John Asiata. Thank you. STC1  talk  00:16, 14 October 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Payne Haas, you may be blocked from editing. STC1  talk  00:20, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce jokes into articles, as you did at Will Penisini, you may be blocked from editing. Wikipedia is a serious encyclopedia, and contributions of this type are considered vandalism. Zayul (talk) 04:06, 14 October 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Payne Haas. Zayul (talk) 04:27, 14 October 2021 (UTC)

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours to prevent further vandalism. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.  Spencer T• C 07:28, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.