User talk:121.169.145.1

March 2017
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Death of Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:35, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Death of Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart was changed by 121.169.145.1 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.955703 on 2017-03-07T01:35:45+00:00.

Hello, I'm Gilliam. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. – Gilliam (talk) 00:47, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2017
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Events leading to the attack on Pearl Harbor has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 04:33, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Events leading to the attack on Pearl Harbor was changed by 121.169.145.1 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.894371 on 2017-04-04T04:33:00+00:00.

Hello, I'm Gulumeemee. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Gulumeemee (talk) 02:38, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at ESPN. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Gulumeemee (talk) 02:43, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at ESPN, you may be blocked from editing. Gulumeemee (talk) 02:50, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Widr (talk) 10:00, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Oshwah. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to John Ross (Cherokee chief) seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   23:37, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to John Ross (Cherokee chief). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   23:38, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

May 2017
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Edmund Hillary. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Simplexity22 (talk) 01:49, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2017
Hello 121.169.145.1, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Korea International School have been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.


 * You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
 * Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
 * Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Copyrights. You may also want to review Copy-paste.
 * If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Donating copyrighted materials.
 * In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
 * Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:02, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm Donner60. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Zoo— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 04:30, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Macaca (term). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. — k6ka  🍁 ( Talk ·  Contributions ) 13:25, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2017
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Solar panel has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:32, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Solar panel was changed by 121.169.145.1 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.982219 on 2017-10-26T01:32:20+00:00.

February 2018
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Inca Empire has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:28, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Inca Empire was changed by 121.169.145.1 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.925129 on 2018-02-21T03:28:24+00:00.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Inca Empire. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. —  IVORK  Discuss 03:31, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2018
Hello, I'm LizardJr8. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Sea of Okhotsk have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. LizardJr8 (talk) 23:57, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sea of Okhotsk. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. LizardJr8 (talk) 23:57, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Solar panel, you may be blocked from editing. Samf4u (talk) 23:59, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Solar panel. Samf4u (talk) 00:01, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

October 2018
Hello, I'm RHcosm. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to West Siberian Plain have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. RH cosm  (talk)  05:31, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2020
Hello, I'm Isabelle Belato. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Homo erectus—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Isabelle 🔔 23:01, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

Hello, I'm JackintheBox. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Down—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. J ACKINTHE  B  OX   • TALK 04:25, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Down. jp×g 05:10, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2023
Please refrain from attempting to make unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been [ disallowed by an edit filter.] If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeatedly attempting to perform disruptive actions may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 05:14, 2 November 2023 (UTC)