User talk:121.221.129.198

June 2020
Hello, I'm Binksternet. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Tech house, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 10:46, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

July 2020
HaeB, look on the footwork page and [ 2 ] instead of [ 1 ] the source is there. 121.221.129.198 (talk) 13:36, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Electronic dance music shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Binksternet (talk) 18:14, 1 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Binksternet, I have provided source on the page here and Jerome Kohl said Wikipedia is not a reliable source, are they saying that Wikipedia is not a good source of information? 121.221.129.198 (talk) 09:45, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
 * You added footwork to the EDM article in a way that made it seem much more important than it is. You also changed the roots of it from "house dance/street dance" as stated by the Guardian to "EDM and hip hop" because of the article about DJ Clent in the Quietus, but both sources are valid. You cannot erase one of them because the other one exists. Finally, you kept up the edit war instead of going to the talk page and discussing the issue to hash out a solution. Which is why I tagged you for edit warring. Binksternet (talk) 15:19, 2 July 2020 (UTC)