User talk:121.99.108.78

August 2017
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person   on Alan Sugar, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 10:20, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: NaturalEventHurricane has been accepted
 NaturalEventHurricane, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Template-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Sulfurboy (talk) 22:22, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=NaturalEventHurricane help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Talkback
Master of Time  ( talk ) 03:29, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of lawyers willing to represent Donald Trump (March 28)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MatthewVanitas was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of lawyers willing to represent Donald Trump and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:List of lawyers willing to represent Donald Trump, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:List_of_lawyers_willing_to_represent_Donald_Trump Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:MatthewVanitas&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:List_of_lawyers_willing_to_represent_Donald_Trump reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MatthewVanitas (talk) 04:05, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Draft:List of lawyers willing to represent Donald Trump
Draft:List of lawyers willing to represent Donald Trump, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:List of lawyers willing to represent Donald Trump and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Draft:List of lawyers willing to represent Donald Trump during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Legacypac (talk) 10:53, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

A belated welcome!


Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, 121.99.108.78. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article
 * Editor's index to Wikipedia

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes ( ~ ); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Questions, or place help me on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Upsidedown Keyboard (talk) 15:23, 25 November 2019 (UTC)

August 2020
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Islamic military jurisprudence—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 13:33, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Materialscientist What!, my edit was contructive, made sense and follows what the guidance of Mohammed, you quick undo, does not make sense and is very unproductive, please explain.121.99.108.78 (talk) 13:36, 28 August 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:NaturalEventHurricane
Template:NaturalEventHurricane has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Guy (help! - typo?) 23:17, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

September 2020
Please do not attack other editors, as you did at User talk:JzG. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. RA 0808 talkcontribs 01:42, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Is Genesis History?
Please explain civily what you would like to change exactly at Talk:Is Genesis History?. I read your edit summary but it wasn't very clear. The article is short and has no criticism subsection. It was also unclear why you removed "myth". Thanks, — Paleo Neonate  – 01:53, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Neonate  Hi Neo, I was trying to structure it like other movies and have a reception section, for criticisms etc and to allow easy additions to this section and easy scan of the article. I did not remove myth, in fact I added Creation Myth and also "fundamental" as both seem very relevant. I was also going to add google review, not sure I should though, fyi 27 reviews (as at today) 24 5 star and 3 1 star, divided by believers of myth and people that view science as a discipline, so not "real" commentary there. Again, my reasoning was it needs to be structured as per the bulk of all movie articles and we do need to have a "reception" or such section., please copy to article talk page if warranted121.99.108.78 (talk) 03:27, 2 September 2020 (UTC)